Thanks for your piece. MonkeyWerx is not what he makes himself out to be. He invents these theories for world events and then uses actual flight data to back up his claims. It's willful so it's disinformation in my book. All he cares about are YouTube ad and product sales revenues.
This is very useful clarification of actual timelines. The MonkeyWerx presentation was a Christmas present of simplicity, but was unfortunately too-simple to be factual...
The P8 seems more likely to be assessing damage. It could have been back-up, in case there was not enough damage done.
With all the time that NATU unmanned mini-subs were around the pipelines from June through September, it would be easy to position radio target-beacons to guide an incoming torpedo, from a P8 or naval vessel. It would also be possible to have placed large shaped-charges on the pipes.
Something like this is always a trial of military offensive capabilities, and NATO had lots of time to get things right.
Conflating a P-8 and a big Sikorsky chopper , and replacing Iceland with the US as the origin and return destination of the P-8 are rather gross misrepresentations of data. Gross misrepresentations of data open the whole article to ready discreditation in the setting of a limited-hang-out denial of full culpability. One might presume that NATO, doing such a deed, would establish several levels of defensive denial ahead of time.
There is no plausible culprit outside of NATO at this point, though who gave the order remains murky, and who is expecting to benefit in the ongoing progression of this war is uncertain.
Who are the dupes at the NATO table?
Russia is holding cards close to chest and preserving open-options, I think.
Thanks, you're not the first to question things. I have been questioning. I worked in the field ages ago.
Thanks for your piece. MonkeyWerx is not what he makes himself out to be. He invents these theories for world events and then uses actual flight data to back up his claims. It's willful so it's disinformation in my book. All he cares about are YouTube ad and product sales revenues.
Thanks Polemos.
This is very useful clarification of actual timelines. The MonkeyWerx presentation was a Christmas present of simplicity, but was unfortunately too-simple to be factual...
The P8 seems more likely to be assessing damage. It could have been back-up, in case there was not enough damage done.
With all the time that NATU unmanned mini-subs were around the pipelines from June through September, it would be easy to position radio target-beacons to guide an incoming torpedo, from a P8 or naval vessel. It would also be possible to have placed large shaped-charges on the pipes.
Something like this is always a trial of military offensive capabilities, and NATO had lots of time to get things right.
Conflating a P-8 and a big Sikorsky chopper , and replacing Iceland with the US as the origin and return destination of the P-8 are rather gross misrepresentations of data. Gross misrepresentations of data open the whole article to ready discreditation in the setting of a limited-hang-out denial of full culpability. One might presume that NATO, doing such a deed, would establish several levels of defensive denial ahead of time.
There is no plausible culprit outside of NATO at this point, though who gave the order remains murky, and who is expecting to benefit in the ongoing progression of this war is uncertain.
Who are the dupes at the NATO table?
Russia is holding cards close to chest and preserving open-options, I think.
Get a hobby, jealousy is an ugly thing. Your followers can swallow your crap.